Services & project scoping

Start with one report. Build from there.

From a straightforward dashboard to a wider reporting rebuild, StrategiQ Analytics matches the work to your sources, business logic and goals. We agree the scope, deliverables and fee before paid work begins.

Discuss My Reporting →See Delivery Experience
No forced packageA one-source report is not priced as though it were an enterprise transformation.
Clear boundariesDeliverables, dependencies and any additional work are agreed before the build.
Discovery when usefulUnclear environments can be understood as a paid piece of work before implementation.
Outcome-led scopeThe proposal is built around what the business needs to change, not billable activity.
Ways to work together

From one painful process to complex reporting architecture.

These are engagement shapes, not rigid product boxes. The right route depends on how well the problem is understood and how much sits underneath it.

For management accounts, P&L or month-end reporting, see our finance reporting service.

Choosing a reporting tool? Read our plain-English guide to Power BI.

Replace

Focused Power BI Dashboards

A sensible first project: one reporting process, agreed KPIs and a dashboard your team can use every week or month.

  • Excel, CSV or another accessible source
  • Validated calculations and interactive reporting
  • Refresh and sharing appropriate to your setup
  • Documentation and a practical handover
Diagnose

Data & Reporting Audit

For a process that is clearly painful but not yet understood well enough to commit to a build.

  • Current process and workbook review
  • Source and business-logic mapping
  • Risk and dependency assessment
  • Target prototype and roadmap
Scale

Complex Data & BI Architecture

For multi-source environments where the difficult work includes access, legacy infrastructure, complex rules, governance or several teams.

  • ERP, SQL, API and legacy integration
  • Complex financial or operational modelling
  • Security, workspaces and governance
  • Ongoing optimisation and support
What changes the scope

The visible dashboard is rarely what drives the cost.

The biggest differences usually sit underneath: how accessible the data is, how much undocumented logic exists, how many sources need to agree, and how production-ready the finished environment needs to be.

Sources & access

One clean database view is a different job from several systems requiring gateway, API or legacy connectivity work.

Business logic

Clear KPI definitions are different from decades of inherited formulas, mappings and exceptions that first need to be reconstructed.

Users & governance

A small internal team has different security, workspace, deployment and support needs from a broad enterprise audience.

Readiness & handover

Existing documentation, source ownership and internal technical capability all affect how much needs to be established as part of delivery.

Commercial approach

A clear scope and fee before paid work begins.

The initial enquiry is free and carries no obligation. If paid discovery is useful, its fee and outputs are agreed first. Each proposal also sets out the delivery timetable, support period, tax treatment and any separate Microsoft licensing or ongoing costs.

1

Initial conversation

Explain what is not working, what the business needs and what you already know about the data.

2

Decide if discovery is needed

Clear projects can move towards scope directly. Messier ones may benefit from a paid audit first.

3

Define scope & deliverables

Agree what is included, dependencies, responsibilities and the intended production outcome.

4

Commercial proposal

Receive a clear proposal based on that scope before implementation starts.

You do not need a budget number to start

Tell us what the problem is worth fixing.

If the current process is wasting time, limiting decisions or creating risk, start there. We will scope the technical work around the value and complexity of actually fixing it.

Discuss My Reporting →Explore Discovery